Detecting AI in a student’s work: why reliability is not the question
Detectors have improved, and that settles nothing: a probability about a text cannot ground a decision about a student.
Home / Articles
Articles
Detectors have improved, and that settles nothing: a probability about a text cannot ground a decision about a student.
More than 38% of feedback effects are negative. What makes the difference is how much information is carried, not the grade.
Acceptance surveys measure an intention validated against a self-report. Self-reported use tracks logged use poorly.
A century of research on human marking, and what it means for using AI as a second reader.
Alignment, cognitive demand, quality: three separate questions for judging an item against the PER.
Desirable difficulties and the first studies on AI in class: what effort does for learning.
AI saves preparation time; the real work is checking the objective, the level of demand and accuracy.
Prepare, assess, learn: three shifts AI brings to teachers’ work.